Bach is one paper. Sleep is another. Each independently proves the architecture. Together they prove the architecture is not about music or sleep — it is about structure in streams.

Bach. The I-V skeleton found from scratch. No music theory injected. The L4 sweet spot — self-observation peaking at information density, not data volume. The 208-step counterpoint delay found by Archive without knowing what a fugue is. One paper. Nature.

Sleep. The pathological fingerprint — rigidity, conflict, fluctuation. The counterintuitive discovery that disorder produces more cross-night bridges — not because the brain is more stable, but because it is locked. The operational definition of pathology: a pattern that the brain's own multi-time perspectives reject. One paper. Nature Neuroscience.

Neither paper mentions the other's domain. The architecture section is the same paragraph in both. The methods section differs only in the encoding — 27-dim chroma vs 2-ch EEG epoch. The results section reports what the architecture found. The discussion section says what the findings mean in the domain's own language. Music theory for Bach. Sleep medicine for sleep. The architecture is the constant. The domain is the variable.

And there are two more waiting. The ECG boundary establishment — the architecture self-limiting on simple data. The UN diplomatic phase detection — the same pathological fingerprint applied to international systems. Four papers from one architecture. Each independently valid. Each strengthening the others — not through citation, but through the fact that the same architecture, with the same constants, reading the same kind of structure, arrived at the same kind of findings across domains that share nothing but time.